Support us
Close nav

Author Archive

Q&A with Movement Director, Shelley Maxwell 

Posted on: February 28th, 2019 by ettEditor

What is one of your earliest theatre memories? 

As a child growing up in Jamaica, I was first exposed to theatre through the world of dance. I would both attend and participate in dance concerts, formal and informal, and fell in love with the feeling of journeying into a place that was beyond the everyday and was instead some place quite magical. 

What was your route into the industry? 

Dance was my chosen route into the world of theatre making. Though it’s debatable as to whether I chose it or it chose me. I studied and honed my craft as a performer and maker in that world, later making my way on stage into musical theatre and subsequently into movement direction. 

What advice would you give to emerging artists? 

I think following one’s passion is always a positive attribute and by doing that you guarantee that there is a constant desire and fire to keep pushing forward. I believe having a strong sense of self-belief and resilience is helpful as an artist, as art is subjective. You can’t please everyone but you can strive to remain true to yourself. 

What has your journey been like from performer to movement director? 

For me it was somewhat a natural progression as, from a very young age, I was practicing the craft of choreography in the world of contemporary dance. I balanced this alongside my performance career and when I decided to retire from stage an opportunity came my way to delve into the world of movement direction. The big difference being I was now working with actors instead of dancers and the huge revelation for me was how much I absolutely loved doing it. The rest as they say is history. 

Who or what inspires you? 

I am constantly being inspired by those I work with. Directors, actors, voice coaches, fight directors – the list is extensive. Every job gives me a new insight into different methods of practice. It’s an eye opening and humbling journey where I get to admire the talents of my peers which in turn keeps pushing me to strive to be better. 

What advice would you give to someone starting out as a Movement Director? 

I think the idea of growing your network is essential. If people don’t know who you are then THEY DONT KNOW WHO YOU ARE. So working on projects whether assisting or shadowing is great in terms of a learning experience but also in terms of putting your face out there. 

What has it been like working on Equus? 

Equus has proven to be a very collaborative experience. The director is very open to exploration and the actors have followed suit by also being very active in the process of devising. It’s been wonderful stepping into the rehearsal room each day not really knowing what might be conjured up. 

What’s next for you? 

Aah the infamous ‘what’s next for you’ question. I’ll answer that more from the stand point of human being and less so from movement director. On my to do list after opening night are my three Rs: Rest, Relaxation and some Reading. 

Divine, Darling! Personal reflections on Peter Shaffer and Equus

Posted on: February 28th, 2019 by ettEditor

Dan Rebellato Professor of Contemporary Theatre at Royal Holloway, University of London  

Peter Shaffer is often described as a spiritual dramatist, someone who digs under the surface of the modern world to retrieve our lost pagan impulses, our neglected connection with divinity. And maybe that’s true, but isn’t it time to acknowledge him as our great lost queer playwright? 

The image of heterosexual marriage in the play is uniformly bleak and unerotic, from Strang’s uncommunicative parents, through Dysart’s briskly hygienic marriage, to Jill’s man-hating mother, and Strang’s erectile dysfunction. Meanwhile, the central axis of the play is between Dysart and Strang and what a queer pairing they make: the former is, by his own account, a ‘finicky, critical husband’, who hasn’t kissed his wife in years, prefers to spend his evenings looking at pictures of athletes, and longs for someone with whom he can share his Greek passions. Strang meanwhile, after a decisive encounter with a man on the sea front, has developed an imagined sexual ritual where he takes a ‘manbit’ in his mouth, and becomes stiff as he yells for his divine lover to ‘take me’. Equus is a play of fetishized masculinity: of cowboys, harnesses, straps, chains, leather, muscle and sweat. 

Strang notes approvingly of his father that ‘he hates ladies and gents like me’, which flutters semantically and queerly between three thoughts: that he is rejecting his mother’s preference for a prim vision of sexlessly noble courtship; that he is rejecting heterosexuality altogether; and that Strang himself is, in some way, both lady and gent. Prior to his brutal mutilation of the horses, he has a revelation of a world of phallic, priapic men:  ‘I kept looking at all the people in the street. They were mostly men coming out of pubs. I suddenly thought – they all do it! All of them! … They’re not just Dads – they’re people with pricks!’ The words sound as aroused as they do horrified 

Dysart admits to being jealous of the boy’s passion and is not the only Shaffer protagonist to feel this. There’s also Pizarro in The Royal Hunt of the Sun, Salieri in Amadeus, the eponymous Yonadab, Philip in The Gift of the Gorgon – all of them in erotic thrall to some divine alpha male (almost literally alpha: Alan, Atahuallpah, Amadeus…). 

Shaffer’s theatricality is part of his dance with forbidden sexuality: although the story sets up a world of hidden feelings and erotic secrecy, the fluidity of the play opens everything up to scrutiny: his narrators (Old Martin, Dysart, Salieri, Yonadab) both conjure worlds magically before us and seem oddly detached from them. Emotionally, it is never quite clear to me if Shaffer’s narrators are inside their plays looking out, or outside their plays looking in. 

In 1988, theatre scholar Vera Gottlieb wrote a ferocious denunciation of ‘Thatcher’s Theatre’ with the accusing subtitle ‘– After Equus’, arguing that Shaffer’s play marks a capitulation to the forces of mysticism and irrationality. Of course, that’s what Dysart says he believes but methinks the doctor doth protest too much. We’re not obliged to accept his reading of events. Gottlieb’s criticism rests on the suggestion that a play like Equus turns away from social reality towards spiritual mystery; but we can read the play differently as presenting that mystical retreat to us and allowing us to understand it. 

The play is built around an intricate series of substitutions: a painting of Christ replaced by a picture of a horse which becomes overlaid with a real horse which is substituted for another horse, just as some key words virally transform in the boy’s imagination (PRINCE becoming PRANCE becoming PRANCUS then FLANKUS then SPANKUS then SPUNKUS, LEGWUS, NECKWUS, FLECKWUS, EQUUS and EK). These substitutions only partly interweave sexuality and worship, but they also draw more broadly on the culture: in that EK, we hear not just the horse-God but brand names from now-forgotten television advertisements in the published, original text: ROBEX, CROYDEX, VOLEX. Consumer society swirls through the play in television jingles and the father’s socialistic prohibitions; his repeated motif is ‘if you receive my meaning’, cleverly amended here to ‘if you take my meaning’ – the phrase equivocating uncertainly between receiving and stealing, as if understanding is a kind of theft. Strang(e) meanings circulate in the black market of this play, like the flows of desire or commodity-production. Equus does not turn away from society towards the irrational but shows us the irrational as the wreckage in a world in transition between the worship of  God and the worship of money. 

Further substitutions takes us from God, to the Father, to the Doctor. Transference of this kind is a familiar enough trope in psychoanalysis, but there’s more to this than meets the eye. Dysart has a recurring dream in which he’s killing children in a sacrificial ritual. Later, he connects this with his role as a therapist and the way he describes his work makes it sound uncannily like gay conversion therapy, insisting that in his work he has taken young people and ‘cut from them parts of individuality repugnant to this God’ to make them ‘Normal’, explaining: ‘The Normal is the indispensable, murderous God of Health, and I am his Priest’. Dysart is claiming something bigger: that the practice of psychiatry is itself a technology of social control. And given Dysart’s own struggles, we might plausibly conclude that ultimately what he has sacrificed is his own homosexuality.  

In this, Equus was bang on trend. It came after a decade of anti-psychiatry debates that argued exactly this. Gay rights activists interrupted the 1970 APA (American Psychiatric Association) in San Francisco, in protest at the Association’s stigmatisation of lesbians and gay men as ‘ill’. While the play continued at the National, French social theorist Michel Foucault was beginning a lecture course at the Collège de France on ‘Psychiatric Power’ which would inform two of his most famous books: in Discipline and Punish, Foucault argues that the early nineteenth century invented a new method of social control in the Panopticon, which created docile citizens by opening them up perpetually to the gaze of power (‘I see you! I see you!’ Equus tells Strang. ‘Always! Everywhere! Forever!). In the first volume of the History of Sexuality, Foucault suggests that power does not control sexuality by silencing it but by forcing it to speak (‘you have to speak the truth at all costs,’ Dysart tells Strang. ‘And all of it’). In December 1973, six months after Strang blinded those Panoptical horses, the American Psychiatric Association famously removed homosexuality from its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Psychiatric Disorder. 

Equus is a much misunderstood play and this production, with its taut eroticism and sleek linguistic power, is a chance to see it for what it is: a profoundly queer play about the political complexities of forbidden desire. 

 

An Act of Violence: A Psychiatrist’s Perspective on Equus

Posted on: February 28th, 2019 by ettEditor

Dr Peter Misch 
Consultant Adolescent Forensic Psychiatrist 

One of the central themes of Equus is that it examines and questions the mental health of children and young people who act out horrific, sadistic or seemingly twisted violent behaviour. This theme is central to the professional role of child and adolescent forensic psychiatrists such as ourselves and within a few lines of the play starting I found myself intrigued. 

Equus was written and informed at a time when the boundaries of mental health and ill-health were being challenged by writers such as RD Laing, shifting from a medical deterministic view of human behaviour to a systemic psycho-social approach and Equus remains as relevant now as when it was first written. 

The role of the adolescent forensic psychiatrist in these cases is not to determine guilt or innocence; this is the role of the Court. It is to ascertain an understanding of the motivations underpinning the behaviour and advise about both treatment strategies for the young person and about future risks to others and how best to manage these risks. 

Engaging a young person in this type of forensic psychiatric assessment is a two-way process that inevitably requires give-and-take between doctor and patient. It requires respect by the psychiatrist for the young person and an interest in that individual that extends beyond the violent act, combined with compassion tempered by honesty about the non-acceptability of the violence. 

In order to build up a level of trust and engagement so that the patient’s feelings and thoughts can be fully shared, some young people need some control in the relationship. As is reflected in the play, this may require some personal disclosure from the psychiatrist. 

In order to gain an understanding of the young person’s relationships with their parents, teachers, their peers and any intimate partners, an assessment inevitably extends to interviewing other informants. A young person’s interests, their hobbies and increasingly their online relationships also inform an assessment. 

The play illustrates some of the multiple dilemmas that can arise for both the ‘patient’ and the forensic psychiatrist of engaging in the assessment process.  

Whilst a sadistic act of violence by a young person evokes both horror and revulsion in others and sympathy for the victim, the violent act may well have a very different ‘meaning’ for the patient. In some cases the violent act may have been experienced as being empowering by the young person. Removing this sense of power by providing insight for a young person in this situation can result in a depressive reaction and if this is not understood and the patient supported, this can result in suicide.  

Extreme cases involving violence inevitably have some degree of emotional impact on the assessing psychiatrist and other professionals, especially where relationships between the patient or victims have been established. 

Compared to men, children (and women) who commit sadistic crimes tend to be demonised by English society, both the press and the Judicial system. England and Wales has one of the highest rates of incarceration in the world and for children, the age of criminal responsibility set at 10 years of age, one of the lowest. 

Equus highlights that there is no simple answer in these cases, but in effect, multiple victims, including the guilty perpetrator. English society has a great compassion for domesticated animals such as horses, which makes the wish for revenge and punishment seem a logical response.  

Hesther Salmon, the female magistrate, in the play takes a different approach to her bench and seeks understanding and care for the offender, Alan Strang. Not all forensic psychiatrists take this approach and some use their skills to ensure long custodial sentences. Whilst it is my professional duty to protect society from violence and recognise the central importance of addressing the impact on victims of crime, including the need for punishment, I am behind the magistrate, Hesther, and psychiatrist, Martin Dysart, in Equus.

Interview with Ned Bennett

Posted on: February 10th, 2019 by ettEditor

 Ned Bennet, Director of Equus

What is Equus about? 

Among other things, Equus is an incredibly sophisticated, visceral exploration of why people commit violent acts.  

We are told at the beginning, much like a true crime podcast, what has happened; a boy (Alan Strang) has stabbed six horse’s eyes out. And then it is as much about why he did it as it is about how this case affects the physiatrist (Martin Dysart). 

Peter Shaffer said he didn’t think Equus had a genre. What genre do you think it is? 

What’s special about Equus is that is goes between different genres. At one point you think you can pin it down as a ‘Why dunnit?’ thriller and the next moment it becomes this profound philosophical meditation on religion and society. The play examines how religious worship can be transferred into someone’s own idea of what a deity is to them.  

The next minute it becomes a theatrical, expressive, mercurial beast. The script manages to go between something incredibly sophisticated and cerebral and something visceral, exciting and suspenseful. 

Why did you want to this project? 

I’m fascinated how the play explodes open our understanding of our primal drives. One of the central conceits of the play is that if someone exhibits what might be described as abnormal behaviour, are they to be listened to or controlled? To this end Dysart falls under the R.D. Laing school of anti-psychiatry; these questions were widely discussed when the play was first produced in the early 70s and feel still resonant now.  

How did it feel to take on such a well-known play? 

It was exciting to be able to draw on the rich history of how the production was put together originally and marry this with this our creative team’s personal response to the text.  The original stage directions contain a mix of practical notes and poetic expressions of how the play was first articulated. 

The play relies heavily on movement direction, what was it like collaborating with Shelley Maxwell? And how did the cast prepare for their roles as horses? 

It was joyous collaborating with Shelley Maxwell, she has such a rich vocabulary of a wide range of movement and choreographic styles, coupled with an extraordinarily lateral imagination. The guiding principle for this work was investigating how Alan Strang’s relationship with Equus shifts with his endowment of Nugget the horse and Equus the God. We workshopped a multitude of versions of the horses and did the obligatory visit to some stables to observe, groom and muck out the horses.  

Did any of your previous work prepare you for the process of directing Equus

When I started out directing I worked part-time for as a Learning Support Assistant in Primary and Secondary Schools with young people with Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties. I drew on these experiences in trying to understand these characters.  

What’s next after Equus

I’m looking to create an outright horror play! 

Interview with Richard Twyman – The Stage

Posted on: September 25th, 2018 by ettEditor

Richard Twyman: ‘I’m intent on taking English Touring Theatre on a journey’ 

By Tim Bano 

As the company celebrates its 25th anniversary, the award-winning director tells Tim Bano the occasion is giving him a chance to take stock and strike a balance between looking forward and looking back, and that his vision is about celebrating diversity, connecting audiences and putting English identity at the heart of everything ETT does

On the face of it, moving from a job as associate director of international work at the Royal Court Theatre in London to artistic director of English Touring Theatre may seem a bit odd. With the Royal Court, Richard Twyman travelled the world: Chile, Zimbabwe, South Africa, Palestine, Lebanon, Turkey, Iraq, India, China. At ETT, he’s barely allowed out of England into Scotland and Wales because of the terms of the Arts Council’s funding. 

But Twyman took the role in 2016 precisely because of that remit: one country, many people, and getting to grips with a national landscape. In his first year, the company visited 39 different cities, each with its own theatre and audience – a far cry from the Jerwood Upstairs space at the Royal Court. 

After training at Birmingham University, followed by a few assisting jobs, Twyman found himself working at Hamleys over the Christmas period demonstrating toys. He got talking to a woman who wanted to buy a cyber dog, and mentioned that he was about to leave to try to become a director. “That’s funny,” she said, “because I’m a theatre agent.” 

It turned out to be Julia Lintott, an agent with Stella Richards Management and former wife of director Terry Hands, who became “something of an angel” to Twyman. She got him a meeting with Gregory Doran at the Royal Shakespeare Company, and he eventually became an associate there. He left in 2008, freelanced for a bit, then joined the Royal Court in 2013 as associate director of international work. 

Then in 2016, the week of the Brexit vote, he was offered the job at ETT. “Like a lot of people, I woke up that morning and had a real shift of perspective, like the ground had changed. And actually, I’d been playing to an audience who probably already believed the perspective of what was being spoken about on stage before they even came to the theatre,” he says. “But with this job I feel, as an artist, it’s about the most useful thing I could be doing.” 

So Twyman’s focus, as the company moves into its 25th anniversary year, is on the word ‘English’. He wants national conversations on a national scale; he wants to find out what’s going on in the country in terms of identity, “because I have no idea”. 

What has he found out so far? “When I joined I was bumping into a lot of received ideas about what theatre outside of London is or isn’t, what audiences outside of London are or aren’t. But audiences will really go with you. I think that’s been the big lesson.” 

On top of that, despite funding challenges that Twyman calls “severe and real”, he argues that the creative environment is much more diverse than in London. That’s partly due to the fact that all of ETT’s shows are co-productions, a decision made by his predecessor Rachel Tackley, with different artistic visions feeding into the programme. 

But Twyman’s own vision for ETT productions is about three things: celebrating the diversity of the country, connecting audiences nationwide – “there’s something extraordinary about that culture pollination effect, with us as with bees” – and placing an examination of English identity at the heart of everything the company does. 

Looking at the 25th anniversary programme, that examination of Englishness is clear in Twyman’s production of Othello, which has the title character as a Muslim in a deeply racist country, and is conceivable in the upcoming revival of Peter Shaffer’s Equus, although details of director Ned Bennett’s take on it aren’t available yet. But how does it feed into Chelsea Walker’s production of A Streetcar Named Desire – one of the all-time American classics? 

“Streetcar, Equus and Othello are all on the syllabus,” Twyman says. “Predominantly we have a much older audience, and there was this essential need to diversify the audience. One way is getting more young people in.” So in that sense it’s about examining what audiences in England are. 

“If we had done that production with just our core audience, it might have been too much. But we also had auditoriums full of incredible school kids responding to it on a really immediate, visceral level, which meant the rest of the audience totally were allowed to go with them. If we want to move forward and we want our work to genuinely be contemporary and genuinely about the world we’re living in today, we have to get different audiences to see it.” 

But there’s a bigger question, too, about why ETT might programme a revival of an all-time classic play. Which is that, without a building, it has to call up hundreds of theatres across the country and ask whether they’d like a week’s run of a particular play. A recognisable title might sell it where a new play wouldn’t. 

“There has to be a really good reason for them to programme it because they’ll also have got a phone call that day from someone else offering something that has a star off the telly.” 

Twyman is adamant that a well-known play should still speak to today. “It has to be about who’s been telling these stories historically and opening that up in terms of who’s telling them now,” he says. So for Streetcar, he wanted it from the view of a young feminist female director post #MeToo, and he promises similar things for Bennett’s production of Equus. 

Where does that leave new work? After all, it’s always been a part of the company’s stated aim. Twyman has no definite answers. “I am determined to find out how we do it. It’s about how we’re commissioning and working with writers to find stories that we can tell on the mid-scale canvas, and then it’s also being more playful and flexible on scale so that we can do new writing in small spaces.” But, he admits: “It’s taking time. I wish it could go quicker, but we’ve done a fair amount of commissioning and I hope by next year we’ll have our first mid-scale new work.” 

As for the 25th-anniversary season, there’s only one piece of new writing, Rose Lewenstein’s Cougar, which is also the only play by a woman across 2018 and 2019. Compare that to 2017, which had four plays by women under ETT’s aegis. Two were new plays – Silver Lining by Sandi Toksvig and Nell Gwynn by Jessica Swale – one nearly new in Sam Holcroft’s Rules for Living and one an adaptation: Purva Naresh’s Pink Sari Revolution. “There has been a bit of a dip,” Twyman says, “and that’s a real problem. We’re really working to address it in terms of our commissioning. And it’s also where we need to get new writing in, because of course the canon is skewed.” 

The anniversary is giving Twyman the chance to take stock, striking what he calls “a careful balance” between looking forward and looking back. “At first it felt limiting not having a building, but it was a big mental shift to think, actually, the opposite is also true: that you have total freedom. We can work with anyone in whatever way.” 

Almost two years into the post, he is clear that he does not want to lose sight of what ETT is, its core belief in the powers of collaboration and partnership, and its advocacy for touring. As for the rest, “I’m someone who just likes to question everything,” Twyman says. “I am really determined to go on a journey and, you know, ETT might end up being unrecognisable from where it is now.” 

Q&A: Richard Twyman 

What was your first non-theatre job?
Bar work. 

What was your first professional theatre job?
Assistant director, Dead Funny, York Theatre Royal. 

What is your next job?
Othello. 

What do you wish someone had told you when you were starting out?
The most exciting projects are the ones you don’t know how to do yet. So just be sure that if you turn down a job it’s not out of fear. 

Who or what was your biggest influence?
I’ve been fortunate to work with many wonderful artists, so there are too many to name. But two particular groups stand out. Firstly, all the incredible design and creative teams I’ve been fortunate to work with. Secondly, the many international artists who’ve challenged me to revisit ideas of what theatre can be and what its purpose is. 

What’s your best advice for auditions?
Try to see them as an opportunity to work on the material, a mini-rehearsal rather than a space to sell yourself or be judged.  

If you hadn’t been a director, what would you have been?
I love the sea, so a marine biologist. 

Do you have any theatrical superstitions or rituals?
I have a ritual with various director friends the day before rehearsals for a new show start. We text each other and say: “How do you direct again?”  

CV: Richard Twyman 

Born: Peterborough (age undisclosed)
Training: Birmingham University, BA in drama and theatre arts
Landmark productions:
• Harrogate by Al Smith, Hightide/Royal Court, London (2016)
• You for Me for You by Mia Chung, Royal Court, London (2015)
• The Djinns of Eidgah by Abhishek Majumdar, Royal Court, London (2013)
• Henry IV Part II, Royal Shakespeare Company (2007/8)
Awards:
• The RSC’s Histories cycle 2006-08 (in which he directed Henry IV Part II) won Oliviers for best ensemble and best revival (2009) and the Evening Standard Editor’s Award (2008)
Agent: Curtis Brown 

 To view the original article, please click here.

 

ETT Appoints New Trustees Paapa Essiedu, Tara Wilkinson and Greg Williams

Posted on: May 8th, 2017 by ettEditor

ETT today announces the appointment of three new trustees joining its Board – actor Paapa Essiedu, producer Tara Wilkinson and Greg Williams, editor of technology magazine Wired.

Paapa Essiedu’s recent stage work includes two RSC productions – the title role in Hamlet (UK Theatre Award for Best Performance in a Play) and Edmund in King Lear. Other recent credits include You For Me For You (directed by ETT Artistic Director Richard Twyman for the Royal Court), Romeo and Juliet (Tobacco Factory Theatres) and King Lear (National Theatre).

Tara Wilkinson is Executive Producer at Underbelly. She previously worked as General Manager at the Old Vic and as Producer for both Paines Plough and Bush Theatre.

Greg Williams is Editor of technology magazine Wired. He has previously held editor roles with Details Magazine, Dennis Publishing, Wallpaper, Arena and Esquire. He has also written five novels.

Chair of the Board Robert Delamere said today,

“I’m delighted to welcome Paapa Essiedu, Tara Wilkinson and Greg Williams to the board of trustees of English Touring Theatre. It’s a privilege to work alongside such exceptional creative talent from across the arts and media industries. They bring a wealth of knowledge, perspective and expertise to the board at an exciting time for the company as we develop under Richard Twyman’s leadership.”

Richard Twyman added,

“Our new trustees are all trailblazers in their field: exceptional creative individuals whose energy and expertise will greatly enrich ETT. Paapa is one of the most talented actors of his generation, an inspirational figure who brings with him a profound understanding of contemporary theatre practice which will be essential in shaping the future of ETT. Tara is a singular and dynamic producer with extensive experience of working at the highest levels of subsidised and commercial theatre, in collaboration with some of the UK’s most successful and innovative theatres. Greg is one of the UK’s leading thinkers, helping to shape the landscape of technology, business and design as editor of WIRED. His wealth of knowledge about the current digital landscape will play a significant role in helping ETT become a touring company for the digital age.”

In a joint statement, Essiedu, Wilkinson and Williams said,

We are delighted to join ETT’s Board of Trustees at such a significant time in the company’s evolution. Though already established as a leader in touring theatre, with Richard Twyman at the helm, the company will continue to build on those foundations and embark on a new period of development. In this phase we want to ensure that audiences across the country can engage with the most exciting, pertinent and imperative plays, old and new – work that reflects the UK as it is now and in the future, in the shifting social and political climate of our times. With our diverse personal and professional experiences of the UK we are much looking forward to being part of the conversation at ETT and helping to shape its future with Richard, ETT staff and the rest of Board.”

Twelfth Night Wins Best Touring Production

Posted on: October 23rd, 2015 by ettEditor

23 October 2015

We are thrilled to announce that Twelfth Night won Best Touring Production 2015 at the UK Theatre Awards.

This marks ETT’s third win and second in a row following 2012’s award for Anne Boleyn and 2014’s award for Translations.

A huge thank you to our wonderful cast, production team and co-producers at Sheffield Theatres!

Stephen Mangan becomes English Touring Theatre patron

Posted on: October 8th, 2015 by ettEditor

8 October 2015

We are delighted to announce that the acclaimed British actor Stephen Mangan is now a patron of English Touring Theatre.

Stephen Mangan stated, “touring theatre is an essential part of our industry and I’m honoured to be joining English Touring Theatre as a Patron. For over 20 years the company has been at the forefront of top quality touring drama. I look forward to supporting their exciting future projects.”

Director of English Touring Theatre, Rachel Tackley, commented, “I am absolutely delighted that Stephen will be joining Sir Ian McKellen as a Patron of English Touring Theatre.  His wealth of experience and knowledge of the industry make him a perfect partner for us as we continue to expand and diversify the company’s work.

In his role, Mangan will act as an advisor to the company across development of new work and programming, as well as being a company spokesperson. His support and guidance, alongside that of Ian McKellen’s, who has been a Patron since 1993, will help to ensure the company remains at the forefront of theatre across the UK.

We look forward to having him on board!

ACE Award Launches Regional Touring Network

Posted on: July 13th, 2015 by ettEditor

13 July 2015

Arts Council England has made a one off award of £826,786 to enable to launch of The Regional Touring Network. Facilitated by English Touring Theatre, The Regional Touring Network, a consortium of 9 regional venues and English Touring Theatre, will produce and tour high quality drama on the mid-scale to audiences throughout England, and by growing audiences through a comprehensive and effective audience development plan will deliver a legacy of sustainable touring.

Director of English Touring Theatre Rachel Tackley said today, “It is clear that there is an appetite for brilliant and ambitious mid-scale work in regional theatres which is currently not being filled. This is a great opportunity for English Touring Theatre to work with these 9 venues and make a real impact on theatregoing opportunities for a broad range of audiences across the country.”

The venues involved are Oldham Coliseum; Northcott Theatre, Exeter; Cast, Doncaster; Warwick Arts Centre; Everyman Theatre, Cheltenham; Lawrence Batley Theatre, Huddersfield; Harrogate Theatre; Queen’s Theatre, Barnstaple and Lighthouse, Poole.

“The timing could not be better as part of our strategy to present a broader co-ordinated drama programme that includes work of all scales,” commented Alan Dodd from North Devon Theatres.

The Regional Touring Network is a three year project to tour top quality classic and contemporary work to audiences across the UK, growing and sustaining demand, and piloting new ways for touring companies and venues to work better together.  The first tour will commence in autumn 2016.

“Our drama programme is the absolute bedrock of our theatre programme and we are committed to ensuring that the productions and companies we present represent high quality, relevant work that audiences engage with and are inspired by,” said Elspeth McBain, Lighthouse Poole.